Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00610
Original file (BC 2014 00610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00610

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected:

      a. to reflect his service number (Administratively 
corrected).

      b. to reflect his service in Korea.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DD Form 214 do not reflect his correct service number which 
should end with “56” verses “57” and his numerous Temporary 
Duties to Korea. 

In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his 
DD Form 214 with his service number ending in “57”, DD Form 4, 
Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States, dated 
27 Feb 69, with his service number ending in “56”, DD Form 4, 
Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States, dated 
18 Mar 69, with his service number ending in “56”, Special Order 
AD-3506, dated 30 Jul 69 with his service number ending in “56” 
and AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, with his service number 
ending in “56”.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 18 Mar 
69.

On 8 Jan 73, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, 
and was credited with 3 years, 9 months, and 21 days of active 
service.   His type of transfer or discharge Release from Active 
Duty and Reenlistment Code 1.

On 23 Apr 14, AFPC/DPSIRP notified the applicant that a review 
of his record revealed several source documents that confirmed 
the service number on his DD Form 214 was incorrect.  On 9 May 
14, a DD Form 214/215 Action Order was accomplished for 
AFPC/DPSOR to correct the applicant’s DD Form 214.  This will be 
accomplished upon conclusion of the Board’s decision.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  A review of the applicant’s Master 
Personnel Record and documentation provided failed to provide 
any substantive Foreign Service time in Korea.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting 
correction of the applicant’s records to reflect his service in 
Korea.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in 
judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the 
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
of injustice.  We note the Air Force OPR has determined the 
applicant’s service number is incorrect and will correct his 
records administratively.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence 
to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the 
requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00610 in Executive Session on 10 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Apr 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIRP, dated 23 Apr 14.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 14.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02940

    Original file (BC 2013 02940.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02940 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his Korean and Vietnam service. The applicant’s AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, reflects that on 14 Feb 55 he was sent to the 45th TRS, Korea. The complete DPAPP...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01495

    Original file (BC-2012-01495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01495 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he served in a war zone in Korea from 1954 to 1955. On 18 Jul 12, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant they were able to confirm his boots on the ground foreign service time at Itazuke Air Base, Japan, from 20 Aug...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00212

    Original file (BC 2014 00212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00212 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be amended to reflect: a. In a letter dated 7 Feb 14, AFPC/DPSIRP advised the applicant his service number on his DD Form 214 was correct and a change was not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00144

    Original file (BC 2014 00144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in Vietnam. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for correction of his DD Form 214 to reflect he served in Korea. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Mar 14, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108

    Original file (BC 2014 00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05218

    Original file (BC 2012 05218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP states that the Board should review the applicant’s records to see if Foreign Service other than what they were able to verify can be determined. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record reflects he was TDY from 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00545

    Original file (BC 2013 00545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They also recommend denial of the AFOR-ST, indicating the applicant separated from active duty several years before the AFOR was authorized; therefore he is not qualified for this award. The applicant provided travel orders for travel to Japan from APO 970, which DPSID verified as Korea dated 11 Mar 57, and a supply form dated 26 Jul 57, issuing him an M-1 Carbine; however, the travel voucher which authenticates the travel order and details exact dates and locations the applicant served...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05724

    Original file (BC 2013 05724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his foreign service in Thailand and Guam (Administratively corrected), and Okinawa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00163

    Original file (BC-2010-00163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect the appropriate awards and foreign service time. Only members of the armed forces of the United States who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or Vietnam Service Medal during the period of service required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed...